19.4.04
Hate Being a Party-Pooper, but....
Seriously, WHY ARE PEOPLE NOT CARING ABOUT THIS SHIT?!? Woodward's new book details the administration's pre-war collusion with Prince Bandar, House of Saud.
Tom Tomorrow sums it up best.
To sum what's discussed, and what was on "60 Minutes" last night - Dubya colluded with the Saudis, who supported/harbored the terrorists who perpetrated 9/11 before the latest Iraq war, to assure there would be lower gas prices around election time.
Every time I think they've gone further beyond the pale than ever...they prove me wrong. Well, no, not wrong - they just beat their own record.
A short, small recap:
1.) ignored multiple, detailed warnings about terrorism, pre-9/11
2.) lied about links to 9/11 terrorists (not to mention WMDs...) to get into the Iraq war
3.) planned the war with people who supported the terrorists whose imaginary link to Saddam was a big part of the rationale for the war
4.) blew the cover of the CIA antiterrorism agent wife of a man who pointed out some of this stuff
5.) orchestrated top-shelf character assassination campaign against own former counterterrorism chief when he tells the truth about what happened (e.g., whispers about "weird" personal life, trumped-up perjury charges on the floor of the Senate, etc.)
Somehow, I don't think Woodward is on the Bushies' Christmas car list anymore...he was useful when the press only covered the nice things he said in his books - keep in mind, Dubya did admit that terrorism wasn't his top priority pre-9/11 in Bush at War, the press just didn't, you know, care about that back in 2002, when they were playing all nicey with his pleasure areas.
Tom Tomorrow sums it up best.
To sum what's discussed, and what was on "60 Minutes" last night - Dubya colluded with the Saudis, who supported/harbored the terrorists who perpetrated 9/11 before the latest Iraq war, to assure there would be lower gas prices around election time.
Every time I think they've gone further beyond the pale than ever...they prove me wrong. Well, no, not wrong - they just beat their own record.
A short, small recap:
1.) ignored multiple, detailed warnings about terrorism, pre-9/11
2.) lied about links to 9/11 terrorists (not to mention WMDs...) to get into the Iraq war
3.) planned the war with people who supported the terrorists whose imaginary link to Saddam was a big part of the rationale for the war
4.) blew the cover of the CIA antiterrorism agent wife of a man who pointed out some of this stuff
5.) orchestrated top-shelf character assassination campaign against own former counterterrorism chief when he tells the truth about what happened (e.g., whispers about "weird" personal life, trumped-up perjury charges on the floor of the Senate, etc.)
Somehow, I don't think Woodward is on the Bushies' Christmas car list anymore...he was useful when the press only covered the nice things he said in his books - keep in mind, Dubya did admit that terrorism wasn't his top priority pre-9/11 in Bush at War, the press just didn't, you know, care about that back in 2002, when they were playing all nicey with his pleasure areas.